Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision | |
| chos [2026/09/05 23:28] – [some examples of foods] wh | chos [2026/09/06 04:48] (current) – [some examples of foods] wh |
|---|
| ^ ^ servings/100g ^ energy ^ total carbohydrates ^ sugars ^ total fats ^ saturated fats ^ protein ^ dietary fibre ^ sodium ^ comments ^ | ^ ^ servings/100g ^ energy ^ total carbohydrates ^ sugars ^ total fats ^ saturated fats ^ protein ^ dietary fibre ^ sodium ^ comments ^ |
| |Table sugar (sucrose) | 25 teaspoons | ~1700kJ | 100g | 100g | nil | nil | nil | nil | nil | | | |Table sugar (sucrose) | 25 teaspoons | ~1700kJ | 100g | 100g | nil | nil | nil | nil | nil | | |
| | |Glucose tolerance test 50g screen | 2x 50g screens | ~1700kJ | 100g | 100g | nil | nil | nil | nil | nil | extended GTT is 100g glucose | |
| |Double Choc Tim Tams | 5 biscuits | 2200kJ | 63.7g | **47.7g** | 27.7g | **16g** | 4.8g | 1.6g | 153mg | general badness at least there is not much salt, (over 2 teaspoons sugar per biscuit) and sat fats | | |Double Choc Tim Tams | 5 biscuits | 2200kJ | 63.7g | **47.7g** | 27.7g | **16g** | 4.8g | 1.6g | 153mg | general badness at least there is not much salt, (over 2 teaspoons sugar per biscuit) and sat fats | |
| |Arnott's mint slices | 6.5 biscuits | 2210kJ | 61.6g | **43.8g** | 29g | **16g** | 3.5g | 3.7g | 126mg | lucky they taste nice as they have far too much sugar (~1.5 teaspoons sugar per biscuit) and sat fats | | |Arnott's mint slices | 6.5 biscuits | 2210kJ | 61.6g | **43.8g** | 29g | **16g** | 3.5g | 3.7g | 126mg | lucky they taste nice as they have far too much sugar (~1.5 teaspoons sugar per biscuit) and sat fats | |
